Ofaku2

Since the government seems to make decisions that just don't make sense in the reality were living in at the moment, ever I am starting to think that they think like this: Any laws, regulations or funding that would have a significant POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE impact is reserved for as much of th future as possible because whoever has already signed the birth certificate is already in significant debt and owes (to them) anyways. So, most of their legislation is viewed upon those that have yet to be born or at the very considered. We can't perceive things like that because we exist amongst consequences that effect us here and now. They do not get effected by consequences of their actions so they have free reign to plan for their future control, see ahead many many steps and the things we notice today have been in the works well before they've taken effect. So, next time you're observing something the government does, think way ahead in the future and it might clear things up a bit. Remember, the governments first mission is to make sure it always exists and that means control mechanisms must be put in place in every area of life.

Jack Altman: So reasoning will lead to science going faster or just new stuff or both? Sam Altman: I mean, you already hear scientists who say they’re faster with AI, like we don’t have AI maybe autonomously doing science, but if a human scientist is three times as productive using o3, that’s still a pretty big deal. Jack Altman: Yeah Sam Altman: And then as that keeps going and the AI can autonomously do some science, figure out novel physics- Jack Altman: Is it all that happening as a copilot right now? [this is exactly what Jack Altman says] Sam Altman: Yeah there’s definitely not… You definitely can’t go say like, “Hey ChatGPT, figure out new physics” and expect that to work. So I think it is currently copilot-like, but I’ve heard like, anecdotal reports from biologists where it’s like, “wow, it really did figure out an idea. I had to develop it, but it made a fundamental leap.” This is a nonsensical conversation, and both of them sound very, very stupid. This is pretty much what they said: “So, is this going to make new science or make science faster?” “Yeah, I hear scientists are using AI to go faster, but if a human scientist goes three times faster using my model that would be good. Also I heard from a guy that he heard a guy who did biology who said ‘this helped.’' I can't believe people give this guy billions 🤔😆

This one is actually a clever move and could be much more effective than tariffs. https://www.reuters.com/business/us-opens-unfair-trade-pr…

AI is the result of fiat. Developers being paid way too fucking much. Chris on TWIB said there's job postings for Google analytics (tracking fucking analytics 🤦🏻) that pay over $300,000/yr. Yeah, AI's gonna do that real soon because that's too much and that guy or anyone that does that won't take less now.