Jack Altman: So reasoning will lead to science going faster or just new stuff or both? Sam Altman: I mean, you already hear scientists who say they’re faster with AI, like we don’t have AI maybe autonomously doing science, but if a human scientist is three times as productive using o3, that’s still a pretty big deal. Jack Altman: Yeah Sam Altman: And then as that keeps going and the AI can autonomously do some science, figure out novel physics- Jack Altman: Is it all that happening as a copilot right now? [this is exactly what Jack Altman says] Sam Altman: Yeah there’s definitely not… You definitely can’t go say like, “Hey ChatGPT, figure out new physics” and expect that to work. So I think it is currently copilot-like, but I’ve heard like, anecdotal reports from biologists where it’s like, “wow, it really did figure out an idea. I had to develop it, but it made a fundamental leap.” This is a nonsensical conversation, and both of them sound very, very stupid. This is pretty much what they said: “So, is this going to make new science or make science faster?” “Yeah, I hear scientists are using AI to go faster, but if a human scientist goes three times faster using my model that would be good. Also I heard from a guy that he heard a guy who did biology who said ‘this helped.’' I can't believe people give this guy billions 🤔😆