Jameson Lopp

Soft forks in the sense that they're mainly removing content. Hard in the sense they're hosted on different domains.

In an amusing twist there are now multiple Puritan forks of my Bitcoin educational resources web site because the original group has split from being pro Knotzi to being mostly anti Knotzi, so there's now a fork of my site for each stance. 🤣

Mostly low severity but there's a moderate and a high/critical buffer overflow CVE.

In all seriousness you sound like a retarded clanker with a tiny context window. 📝 f18f249f…

As an avid motorcycle rider I've always wanted to try snowmobiling. It does seem more dangerous simply because the "road" must be a lot harder to read.

Easy workaround: make the market be about whether or not they will still be doing their job on date X 😆

Holy shit, the latest OpenSSL release patches 12 zero-day vulnerabilities, all of which were discovered by AI agents. The really crazy thing is that 3 of the bugs had been present since 2000, for over a quarter century having been missed by intense machine and human effort alike. One predated OpenSSL itself, inherited from Eric Young’s original SSLeay implementation in the 1990s. All of this in a codebase that has been fuzzed for millions of CPU-hours and audited extensively for over two decades by teams including Google's. It's pretty scary to realize that fundamental aspects of everyday internet security have been vulnerable for decades. I can only imagine that AI is going to unearth many more vulnerabilities in the coming years.

I support you crying like a little bitch about non-issues.

I already made my case and won't be repeating myself. I will enjoy watching you fork off to a DOA network. https://blog.lopp.net/a-laymans-guide-to-bip-110/

Neither I nor Bitcoin as a system give a fuck what authoritarians in the UK think.

No shit, the debate ended last year. Now you can fork off 🥳

Puritans never had credibility. Now it will finally be more obvious once the market resoundly rejects puritanism.