tree 木

It's interesting how the creators of the *multi-platform* social client @Openvibe disappeared from Nostr. The last activity I see from the team is in August.. I am more and more convinced that bridging and connecting different protocols in the social sphere doesn't work very well. Why? Maintenance becomes exponential - Every protocol has its own update cycles and breaking changes. You're not building one client - you're building several. When one protocol changes, everything breaks. Lowest common denominator - To work everywhere, bridges strip out what makes each protocol unique. Nostr's zaps, Mastodon's content warnings, Bluesky's feeds - all lost in translation. Users get a watered-down experience. Identity doesn't translate - Nostr keypairs, ActivityPub domains, and AT Protocol DIDs are fundamentally incompatible. Bridges create confusing mapping layers instead of real unification. Culture clash - Each protocol has its own norms and expectations. Bridges create an awkward middle ground where nobody feels at home.