ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Lazarus Long25d ago
Why begging though? Educating yes, but an empty mempool is a truer metric for where bitcoin adoption is really at. We both know that if bitcoin succeeds, empty mempools will be a memory. But why fill it with nonmonetary crap in the meantime? Mining as an industry is already bigger than bitcoin needs it to be. Making mining more profitable than it should be by cramming data into the empty block space is skewing the incentives. We've seen that data degeneracy can push tx prices higher. Any upward pressure is unjust to a puritan as myself. I don't see it as sensorship. You're OK with the Bitcoin network not relaying MasterCard transactions, or real estate sale transactions. That's a type of sensorship. Bitcoin the network is for transferring bitcoin. Why should I have to verify and store non monetary data? There is no set definition of what bitcoin is to everyone. Just Fuzzy consensus about what we all agree on. Non monetary data is not bitcoin to me, and does reduce its's qualities as money. That's why 110.
๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 2064b07d6a53โ€ฆ

Replying to: 2bfb306df8beโ€ฆ

Replies (1)

2Pac25d ago
Begging is just hyperbole. Why is the data make the transaction non monetary, the transaction costs sats in the form of fee and sats are money therefore all transactions are monetary. If I draw a mustache on a $1 bill and pay you with it does the mustache make that a non monetary transaction? I do not care what data anyone adds to there transactions because the fee of your transaction is dictated by the size of the transaction if you are willing to pay who cares the block size is already limited it makes no difference to me. All Bitcoin transactions are monetary there is no spam. Any censorship is a threat to the value of the network. The networks value increases with active users. Censorship is a slippery slope.
000
0 sats