ms slopp

passive core fam massive bore spam

Unfortunately due to Core's actions and Core's BS so called arguments all trust in them is gone. Zero. 0 They, the Chaincode labs, the Brink all of them bent the knee to shitcoiner spammer VCs like Citrea (with investors like Peter Thiel and Jameson Lopp) and of course all the rest of the spammers and shitcoiners who benefit from spamming Bitcoin - Inscriptions/Ordinals/Runes spmmers, David Bailey and the ones who gravitate around Shitcoin Magazine, Charles Hoskinson and many many more. We see even Andy Back got bent and supports spammers.

How exactly is Bitcoin decentralization "maintained" by increasing OP_RETURN? I know that you will larp the Core BS propaganda that (large) miners already can put large OP_RETURNs so lets allow anyone put large spam on Bitcoin. That is BS. Uncapping OP_RETURN not only does not solve anything it just allows more spam. It also signals that spam is now acceptable in Bitcoin. More spam makes running nodes harder thus hurting decentralization of Bitcoin. Look at Ethereum and who runs ETH nodes. They did it because Citrea needed it. Miner decentralization is actually solved by DATUM from Ocean who came from Luke and Bitcoin Knots guys. It allows running (solo)miners and creating your own mempool templates. Filtering out spam, which are the sane defaults in Bitcoin Knots mempool, helps better decentralization amognst node runners.

ITS 25% OF NODES AND COUNTING 🤣 KEEP THAT SHITCOINING HEAD BURIED IN SAND

Because they are attacking one of the principles of this network: descentralization. They want few homologued nodes runs by pedos.

Knots > Core

Because they're on the correct course. Pissing off ignorant puritans is just an added bonus.

At least one of the reasons is because they are concerned that reputational damage to Core would lead to protocol fragility.

Bip 110 is not a problem - it is code not narrative - if it fails and there is an attempt to make it consensus … then it becomes narrative. Core is pure narrative and centralization of Bitcoin. Luckily Knots has saved the network by simply existing. Implementation of BIP 110 and using pure code and consensus gives us hope for the future. It’s how it should be … changes comes when the network agrees - not by big donors who pay to make changes for their own agenda.

🎶 I want a party Pink macaroons and a million balloons And performing baboons and give it to me – Now! I want the world I want the whole world I want to lock it all up in my pocket It's my bar of chocolate Give it to me now! 🎶 Don't 🎶 care 🎶 how 🎶 I 🎶 want 🎶 it 🎶 now 🎶 Don't 🎶 care 🎶 how 🎶 🎶 I 🎶 want 🎶 it 🎶 nowwwwwwwww!

☝️

😄😄

core has failed in making everybody use bitcoin. because it is not there role. what to point fingers at? other than core?

Core doesn't answer to plebs. You're going to need to fork.

Money and/or EGO. They took @04c915da…3dfbecc9 VC money or they don’t want to look bad. But not realizing the mistake makes them look even worse. They are toast. They clearly think they control Bitcoin. And they just shot themselves in the foot.

Jameson SLopp is investor in Citrea. Another investor in Citrea is Peter Thiel the chairman of Palantir. Large OP_RETURN directly benefit Citrea shitcoiners.

Fork and good bye.

Yeah, dumbass. Go watch the full uncut interview where I explain why Citrea neither needed nor asked for the change. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EscZzzTyrFY

He just explained plain as day why the OP_RETURN change was totally unnecessary “an extreme edge case… only Citrea needs it at the moment…. Where someone needs to have visibility across the network in an unconfirmed state” Tough shit! Who do the fuck do they think they are?

Rename Jamo to John Cena, ‘can’t see me’ GM, Happy SATurday 🫡