ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Murch296d ago
Curious if this is an unpopular opinion: It was with too hard to get a BIP processed in the past and now people put BIPs on a pedestal. But BIPs are author documents. Especially in Draft stage, they do not present community consensus — they're the authors’ personal recommendation to the Bitcoin community. It seems good to me that we get a few controversial BIPs. It clears up that it's still the readers’ responsibility to make up their mind.
💬 10 replies

Replies (10)

YODL296d ago
Yeah, makes sense to me. I had to be reminded not that long ago that it's just a formalized idea, not a road map
0000 sats
Thekid.999296d ago
I'm gonna put one in to change the name to Bitties and titties
0000 sats
Murch296d ago
There is a bit of a range between controversial and unserious. ;)
0000 sats
Bb808d0…fbc0f1296d ago
More like weaponization of democratic procedures to me. It is OK to wrestle with new ideations every once in a while as a community to keep things fresh and up-to-date, but not when it is incentivized for winning brownie points, platforming & scoring personal wins etc
0000 sats
Jameson Lopp296d ago
There are no democratic procedures. This is crypto anarchy.
0000 sats
waxwing296d ago
Even more controversial opinion: wallet standards and best practices shouldn't be BIPs. This even includes things like BIP32 let alone 39, 44 and family, let alone tons of others. They have no relevance to the Bitcoin protocol. I still think there's immense value in such standardization... just that it should be somewhere else.
0000 sats
Constant296d ago
You should turn that into a BIP
0000 sats
Erik295d ago
I agree. Having a bip number, literally means that, you have a bip number. Bip editors are't there to decide what have and what doesn't have consensus. The only thing I don't like about the bips repo is the weird numbering. But that's just my OCD talking 😂
0000 sats
Kevin's Bacon296d ago
I agree with you here!
0000 sats
David A. Harding295d ago
Why not use BIPs? What's the value of standardizing them elsewhere?
0000 sats