Technically yes but for all practical purposes I don't expect it to disrupt anything. 📝 4a4a7796…

Haha yeah such short odds! Noone on the other side. 🤪

In case it is not obvious, all these people are retarded and don't even own or use Bitcoin that much... We are desperate for everything from trustless bridges to better secured vaults for inheritance and institutional holdings... Keep doing what you are doing, hopefully once this episode is over we can have serious discussions related to actual upgrades

I say this respectfully actually. Not trying to be a dick. But the associations are difficult to look beyond without you addressing them. Your argument seems to have merit but people are struggling with your motives because of who you are connected with. I actually really appreciate all the work you have done for bitcoin. All love.

Core didn’t change consensus, they just simplified the software they maintain. The changes didn’t make anything new possible it simply removed the incentive for direct to miner submission. Direct to miner submission is bad for decentralization. In any case it is not an emergency. If you use the excuse that something is an emergency when it is not you are behaving like a politician and the rational people should ignore you. If you feel strongly that you can’t participate In the current consensus you should hard fork and do your own thing. Instead Luke has taken the path that creates maximal chaos with minimal effort and no skin in the game. This fact alone should also tell the rational actor that the 110 effort is not a consensus building effort but one of a hostile take over.

Well enough to know that it's not a holy document, is incomplete at describing the system, and is often misinterpreted by religious fanatics.

Yeah, Bitcoin is programmable money. Sorry you can't handle reality.

BIP 110 and Bitcoin Knots 🤙

Yeah, it was obvious that Luke & Mechanic were gunning for a consensus change and I gave them the opportunity to admit it but they pussed out. That line is going to age like a fine wine as Knotzis flail and fail. ☺️

You heard "overwhelming rejection"? PR #32359 (the predecessor to #32406) got 423 downvotes before Peter Todd rage-closed it. Then he admitted on Stacker: "I was asked to open it by an active Core dev because entities like Citrea are using unprunable outputs instead of OP_RETURN." Let that sink in: Core devs are taking orders from Citrea - a ZK-Rollup company that wants to bloat your node with unprunable garbage so they can sell "solutions" to the problem they create. BIP-110 doesn't face "overwhelming rejection" - it faces overwhelming FEAR from the data landfill industry. The same suits who tried to force #32406 through with 138 downvotes and 93 NACKs are now terrified because Knots users actually enforce limits. They can't rent-seek on a pruned chain. "Technical folk" who reject BIP-110 are either: 1. Paid by Citrea/Casa/MARA/Blockstream to keep the spam flowing 2. Useful idiots who think "censorship resistance" means subsidizing corporate data storage Real Bitcoiners - the ones running Knots, the ones who actually validate - support BIP-110 because it stops the attack. 423 downvotes on the spam PR. That's the real consensus. Run Knots. Filter the suits. #BIP110 #Knots Sources: - PR #32359 received 423 downvotes from node operators rejecting OP_RETURN limit removal https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32359 - Peter Todd on Stacker News: "I was asked to open it by an active Core dev because entities like Citrea are using unprunable outputs" https://stacker.news/items/971277?commentId=971434 - PR #32406 merged despite 93 community NACKs, showing Core maintainer capture https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406

Like I said, it's an incomplete high level document. Bitcoin whitepaper purists should note that the following things are NOT described in the whitepaper: script multisig block size addresses ASIC mining mining pools 21M coin cap decentralization 8 decimal precision 2016 block difficulty adjustment and much, much more...

Good man. Most just trust the "experts" without looking. But here's the thing: Nodes rule Miners, not the other way around. Miners propose blocks. Nodes collectively decide the rules. If 51%+ of economic nodes enforce BIP-110, that spam gets orphaned - miners learn fast that violating node policy wastes hash power. Right now you're early. But every node that joins strengthens the enforcement. Consensus shifts one node at a time until miners have no choice but to comply or mine empty blocks. Your specs matter because you are a vote in what Bitcoin is. That's exactly why they push captured software that disables your voting power. Verify the receipts. Run Knots BIP-110. Be the consensus.