hard to understand the upside of your posts here: Jeremy Rubin (MIT Media Lab / DCI) -Appears only by institutional association with MIT. -Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab broadly. -No emails, meetings, funding, or personal relationship involving Rubin. Amir Taaki -Name appears only as a historical Bitcoin figure reference. -No correspondence, meetings, funding, or institutional overlap. Gavin Andresen -Referenced as an influential Bitcoin developer. -No emails, meetings, funding, or relationship with Epstein. Austin Hill (Blockstream) -Appears in early Blockstream seed-era context as a company Epstein explored. -No evidence of meetings, solicitation, or Epstein investment. -No personal correspondence shown. Adam Back (Blockstream) -Named because of Blockstream, not personal contact. -No emails, meetings, funding, or relationship with Epstein. Brian Armstrong (Coinbase) -Mentioned in VC deal-flow emails where Epstein attempted access to Coinbase. -No emails to/from Armstrong. -No evidence Armstrong met Epstein or accepted capital. Bryan Bishop -Appears only as a technical / research name reference. -No emails, meetings, funding, or institutional ties. Michael Saylor -Referenced as a macro/tech figure. -No emails, meetings, funding, or relationship shown. -Any reference predates his Bitcoin involvement. (Above is AI assisted obviously.)

Because giant blocks centralize nodes which gives easy targets for state actors to pull guns on Computer science and markets But go ahead keep virtue signaling, I’m sure in your world solutions are just another git commit away

Don't expect much from @ODELL to purge bad actors though because he could be in bed with these bad actors otherwise there is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON TO RUN SHITCOIN CORE AT THIS POINT unless you are bad actor/pedo or you have severe Luke/Ocean/Knots Derangement Syndrome

Purge yourself if you want purge. 😂

The pedos at Core have nothing to fear, Jameson Lopp is here!

Blockstream cypherpunks fighting hard against the machine.