Well, your lived experience, just like mine, is that we have been brainwashed from the day we were born. My assertion is that no virus exists, not that just Covid doesn't exist. 1) https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-w… 2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/pWcHXqLDVvYL 3) https://www.bitchute.com/video/URcvRFVibHJF No virus has ever been isolated. Vaccines are used to depopulate. Your cousin got sick of something (doesn't mean it was Covid), even if she had a positive Covid test. Falsification is independent of replacement and the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. In other words, if you say that Covid exists, you ought to isolate the virus and prove it and so far no virus has ever been isolated as shown in the 2 documentaries above. You can't conclude that your cousin was sick from Covid just because she was sick. In regards to nuclear weapons, I wrote that there is no evidence that anyone has ever split an atom and nuclear weapons as advertised exist. That doesn't mean that very powerful bombs don't exist. 1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ The podcast I've linked to above has all of the receipts. There is no evidence that an atom has ever been split. There was a study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 1990. The 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki found radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations. "intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congential abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes." All of the receipts are in the podcast I've linked to (peer-reviewed scientific journals). The Japanese people likely got firebombed. "It is an established fact that napalm chemical firebombing of wooden Japanese cities was extremely destructive. In May 1945, Tokyo was hit with incendiary payloads from 334 B-29 Superfortresses, burning 16 square miles and destroying more than half of the city. The Hiroshima operation involved 4 sq. miles. Using the Tokyo ratio, it could have been achieved with 83 planes. Hiroshima was a wooden shantytown constructed in a concentrated area. It was a sitting duck for a carefully crafted firebombing terror attack with an atomic-bomb psyop added on for full effect." There are literally pictures of concrete buildings that survived a ground zero atomic blast. Hiroshima looks carpet-bombed. I'd focus more on the "viruses don't exist" part because very many people poison themselves and their loved ones with vaccines. Whether somebody gets bombed with an "atomic bomb" or gets fire-bombed, the end result is likely the same.

That's a great question and the answer is - I don't know for sure, which is why I advocate for owning both (bitcoin and gold). It is possible that some governments are accumulating BTC behind the scenes, although I haven't seen any credible evidence. I like to read revealed preference - you prefer X over Y if, when offered both, you choose X. So far in my view, revealed preference points to gold. You are looking at this from the multipolar (competing governments) viewpoint, whereas in my opinion we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-unde… ). With countries representing 98% of global GDP developing/implementing CBDCs, the level of coordination is striking. BTC's settlement doesn't require state-controlled rails, which in my opinion is not something the Controllers are likely to embrace. This would destroy their ability to weaponize monetary rails. As you noted gold reserves of the West are very opaque. Only a small portion of gold buying by Central Banks is reported, and usually mostly by Emerging Market Central Banks. G7 can’t be seen stampeding into gold. If you're running the incumbent fiat+bond system (US, Eurocore), it is suicidal optics to visibly join the gold rush. If the US or major euro Central Banks started aggressively buying gold, the obvious signal to foreign creditors and domestic savers is: - “We are preparing for currency debasement / reserve system change.” That would basically nuke the bond market. Also, the moment you say "we’re buying gold because it’s the ultimate money", you implicitly admit: - "Your pensions and savings are sitting in a debasing unit we control." That's a legitimacy grenade. The official script still needs: - "fiat is fine", - "the dollar/euro are stable reserve currencies", - "gold is just another reserve asset, barbarous relic, diversification". If you visibly act like a goldbug, you blow up that narrative. I have written more about why I think all roads lead to gold in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/all-roads-lead-to-gold ). If you look at the EU architecture, it is practically the Freegold model ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/mario-draghi-revealed-t… ). Euro was deliberately designed so that: - Gold is not legally "backing" the currency (no fixed parity), - But is held on the Eurosystem balance sheet, - And crucially, marked to market regularly in euros. I can write more on this and this is something I've done a lot of research on, but many people in positions of power and many bankers have slipped over the years (have given away that for them gold is the final store-of-value). I could probably write a 100 more articles like the Mario Draghi one just analyzing how different individuals in positions of power give up the game. If you want to look at it from a darker point of view - if the Controllers are thinking in global balance-sheet terms, it's coherent: 1) You want the manufacturing/real-asset bloc (China + some EM) to survive the reset with: - enough private wealth in hard assets to keep working, - enough sovereign + household gold to have credibility in the Freegold world. 2) You want the rentier/consumption bloc (US/EU middle classes) to bear a bigger share of the claim destruction, because: - their wealth is easier to dematerialize, - their consumption can be cut without immediate loss of productive capacity. Hence the asymmetry: - West: encourage paper, discourage gold. - China: accept/encourage physical gold accumulation. Chinese state-linked media regularly push narratives like "gold is a safe long-term store of value" and encourage retail buying. The West, not so much. Ultimately, I don't have any insider information, so all I can do is read incentives based on the information that I have and guess.

Also I still think that my athletic young cousin getting what seemed to be a respiratory infection that caused severe lung damage in April 2020 strongly suggests that some freak illness was circulating at the time of "Covid" ...

I think it's very unlikely for Bitcoin held in self-custody (properly) to end up being a rugpull because the government would much rather you own Bitcoin than physical gold or something like Monero. Based on my research, in 99% of cases, the government would prefer you own Bitcoin than physical gold. The other 1% of cases are mostly people who move 8-9-10 figures in Bitcoin to finance groups the government doesn't like (very rare). So I don't think governments wan to rug Bitcoin, but that doesn't mean they execute everything perfectly and don't overshoot. One area where they might overshoot is the Quantum scam ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-up… ). At present, nearly 90% of stocks are held by the top 10% of society, and that same 10% of society performs nearly 50% of all consumer spending. So wealth is very concentrated (mostly amongst boomers as you said). For them to run the Great Taking, they don't actually need to rug most of the population. As you said, younger cohorts are still on average much more dangerous than older ones - which is why you build the control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC), and send some of them to die in senseless wars. It's going to be tough to get young people to organize if 1/5th of the people in their country were imported in the last 10 years (mass migration). Running the Great Taking is still very risky. If I am correct that they want to reset, they likely want to keep Bitcoin as a plan B in case they aren't able to execute Freegold cleanly (which would be relatively low probability but enormous upside). I need to write more on demographics because it's very important and nuanced, but TL;DR: The developed world ran: - a demographic Ponzi (ever-growing base), - layered with a financial Ponzi (ever-growing claims). Fertility collapse + aging = demographic Ponzi is over. Debt explosion + low real growth = financial Ponzi is over. Controllers now need some combination of: - expropriation (Great Taking), - re-basing (Freegold + inflation), - control rails (Palantir/MSFT/ID/CBDC), - and carefully managed leaks (BTC, physical gold in private hands). Demographics is the slow needle that burst the illusion that you can: - promise infinite pensions, - with finite young workers, - and never have to choose who eats the loss. In other words, demographics is the deep constraint surface the rest of the game is played on.

> I certainly became wealthier fiat wise, but I didn’t sign up for another shitcoin copy of Ethereum. Yes, the "I certainly became wealthier" part is how I cope as well. > The greatest disappointed for me tho was how naive, stupid and two-dimensional Bitcoiners ended up to be. I am very bearish on any community (Bitcoiners included). I just was stuck in podcast hopium land (mainly Jeff Booth) up until I started doing my own research. I was high on protocol-level truth hopium (consensus rules, proof-of-work, 21M cap, etc.), and ignored the fact that protocol truth without perimeter control is a philosophical win and a market loss. To be fair, I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions. Once I realized that Bitcoin's survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks, I pretty much checked out mentally to be honest.

Insta muted but I'm the one arguing in bad faith, sure Jan. Yeah, I got better things to do with my time and guessed which branch of this conspiracy you fall into wrong. For those wondering most viruses are 20-300nm. Visible light ends at 400nm wavelength. It is a limit of physics that you cannot photograph a thing with light waves larger than the thing. Electron microscopes solve that problem by not using visible light and have imaged viruses. They also have distinct genome which has been sequenced for over 100,000 different viruses. By this "I can't see it with light it isn't real" logic; atoms, electrons, x-rays, hell even sound and heat aren't real. This is a classic science denialism influencer approach. Demand a very precise thing that is impossible for a good reason and then argue that it being impossible proves all science is a lie. I can't levitate, which proves flying is impossible which proves that birds are a psyop.

Ossification is vital once Bitcoin returns to its natural state #bip110 Bitcoin is only meant to be money. Not a shitcoin casino or a data storage playground for VC funds.