ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Control-Plane Capital4d ago
> I certainly became wealthier fiat wise, but I didn’t sign up for another shitcoin copy of Ethereum. Yes, the "I certainly became wealthier" part is how I cope as well. > The greatest disappointed for me tho was how naive, stupid and two-dimensional Bitcoiners ended up to be. I am very bearish on any community (Bitcoiners included). I just was stuck in podcast hopium land (mainly Jeff Booth) up until I started doing my own research. I was high on protocol-level truth hopium (consensus rules, proof-of-work, 21M cap, etc.), and ignored the fact that protocol truth without perimeter control is a philosophical win and a market loss. To be fair, I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions. Once I realized that Bitcoin's survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks, I pretty much checked out mentally to be honest.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 7670055e4232…

Replying to: 6b8d703b4258…

Replies (1)

Des Imoto マキシ4d ago
Agree. For me, #bitcoin is still the only chance we have to get back to a feedback mechanism that promotes value creation and results in devastating consequences for bad behavior. This only works if we take humans completely out of the equation. The Developers are the only threat to #bitcoin s rule set. My hope is #bip110 reverses some of the damage to the code. But then we need to somehow freeze or lock up the code. Obviously that would mean broad consensus on a specific version of the code and the consensus that ANY change to the code is an attack on Bitcoin.
000
0 sats