Politics is always a package deal with things you won’t like and should be compared to the alternatives. I also expected more of Bondi & probably Patel also. I am, however, glad Iran is being addressed. From 1992 they have actively supported armed terrorism in Southern Africa and help destabilize the region. Even the European are glad, but won’t always say it out loud. I know my Iranian friends in the Netherlands are really happy. The thing that Americans will have to realize again is something that Thomas Jefferson and John Adams also had to learn the hard way during the Barbary wars era. And that is that it is Islams right and duty to attack non-believers that do not acknowledge the profit. In my experience none of this has changed.

1. Campus hate speech laws: It was geared towards non-citizens/VISAs sowing discord. It had little to do with what they said, but how they conducted themselves. 2. dismissive response to the Epstein files: I agree with you. 3. inability to stay true to America First when confronted by Israel and inability to end any wars while starting two more have been the final straws: Lots of issues with this claim. 1. You’ll need to define “start two wars”. Venezuela certainly isn’t that and you demonstrate your position as a first world citizen with internet access in claiming it is. 2. You’re not privileged, again, as a citizen of a first world country with internet access to every threat assessment. You can chose not to believe what you are told, that’s your prerogative, but you certainly don’t know what you aren’t told regarding threat assessments against Trump or the general public. I’ll provide an example of what we are told (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-accused-plot-assassinate…). There’s a sentiment on the internet that, because we have the internet, we know and understand all threats and enemies foreign and domestic. Truth is, you don’t. If you do claim to know and understand all threats, that’s incredibly native. So I’d encourage you to reconsider your #3. It’s just misguided. There is evil in the world. If something terrible did happen (9/11), Americans ask why they weren’t protected or create an inside job narrative. If something terrible doesn’t happen because of protection, the general public rarely knows it. If something terrible doesn’t happen because of preemptive strikes, the general public knows best and it’s not in our interest. It’s only in countries with free speech does the general public reverberate calls like this. These claims get squashed in countries like Iran. Don’t get me wrong, Trump has his faults, as do all men, but you should reconsider what you’re actually saying on point #3.

I’ll also add that Trump doesn’t unilaterally make laws, much less campus hate speech laws. So I’m not even really sure what you’re referring to here. You can still say whatever you want to on campus aside from harassment, true threats, or incitement to imminent violence. You can also be trespassed as campus isn’t public property. I would encourage you to reconsider your position here.