1. Campus hate speech laws: It was geared towards non-citizens/VISAs sowing discord. It had little to do with what they said, but how they conducted themselves. 2. dismissive response to the Epstein files: I agree with you. 3. inability to stay true to America First when confronted by Israel and inability to end any wars while starting two more have been the final straws: Lots of issues with this claim. 1. You’ll need to define “start two wars”. Venezuela certainly isn’t that and you demonstrate your position as a first world citizen with internet access in claiming it is. 2. You’re not privileged, again, as a citizen of a first world country with internet access to every threat assessment. You can chose not to believe what you are told, that’s your prerogative, but you certainly don’t know what you aren’t told regarding threat assessments against Trump or the general public. I’ll provide an example of what we are told (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/man-accused-plot-assassinate…). There’s a sentiment on the internet that, because we have the internet, we know and understand all threats and enemies foreign and domestic. Truth is, you don’t. If you do claim to know and understand all threats, that’s incredibly native. So I’d encourage you to reconsider your #3. It’s just misguided. There is evil in the world. If something terrible did happen (9/11), Americans ask why they weren’t protected or create an inside job narrative. If something terrible doesn’t happen because of protection, the general public rarely knows it. If something terrible doesn’t happen because of preemptive strikes, the general public knows best and it’s not in our interest. It’s only in countries with free speech does the general public reverberate calls like this. These claims get squashed in countries like Iran. Don’t get me wrong, Trump has his faults, as do all men, but you should reconsider what you’re actually saying on point #3.