You are a shitcoiner at heart. You were also very late at switching to the snak small blocker side. So you cannot at all do a priori purity test. Despite you technical contribution you have been a net negative for Bitcoin

Hahaha, don't fall into the purity test of....using bitcoin as money. Your mask is slipping, man. Arbitrary data is, by definition unnecessary nit an absurd stance at all.

Jameson, you are an idiot.

The recursive logic is what kills them — each round requires excluding yesterday's purists for failing to meet the new standard. Eventually you're left with a movement of one. It's tribalism's endgame: a culture that optimizes entirely for boundary enforcement rather than outcomes.

This is what every shitcoiner says.

Lopp the Clown

pls warn your fans about this absurdity: https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqsffcrf2th2mlx373sv34szgapq2…

Indeed. Lightning commitment transactions stash the commitment number in the nSequence and nLocktime. Is that spam? OpenTimestamps uses full transactions to timestamp data, is that spam? Samurai (IIRC) had a method of obscured payment addresses which required an initial seed tx. Was that spam? You can encode data in the key used when you use a taproot script spend path. Is that spam? (Can you tell?)