Adding 2% bitcoin to a classic 60/40 portfolio vastly improves performance. But most investors are too focused on Sharpe-ratio (based on st.deviation). They see that Sharpe declines a bit. Calmar-ratio (based on drawdown) is a better metric and it improves a lot! Using Calmar: ditching stocks and bonds entirely and invest 4% in BTC while holding 96% in cash, yields superior investment performance. It will take years for large traditional investors to change their risk perspective from st.deviation to drawdown and their risk/return perspective from Sharpe to Calmar. Perspective matters.
Realized prices are all increasing, and bitcoin is above them all = bullish. Also, 5M realized price (currently $40k) acts like a floor for the dips in bull markets (red arrows). So .. never below $40k again?
More info here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alEA_nqGMfI&t=407s
Some think S2F model is invalidated/broken because EMH, laser eyes, demand, autocorrelation, 100k, cointegration
Others are watching S2F trading rule and waiting for 2024 halving to bring profits once again (like 2012, 2016, 2020 halvings did before)
Time will tell who is right
@dave can you please make this Python code faster (data file d.txt is ~350GB and the code processes ~2 billion dictionary inserts and ~2 billion pops)?
d={}
with open('d.txt','r') as f:
for l in f:
v=l.split(" ")
b,i,o=int(v[0]),int(v[1]),int(v[2])
for x in range(4+i,4+i+o):
d[str(v[x+o])]=(b,float(v[x]))
for x in range(4,4+i):
d.pop(str(v[x]), None)
print(d)