kyle

Every 15 years, the tech industry "rediscovers" a thesis from the 70s - 90s, gives it a sexier name, and raises millions in VC funding for it In this case, it's context layers for AI systems, which are 30 years old.

Hello Nostr, if you have not read anything by Neil Postman, I highly recommend you do. “Amusing ourselves to death” is such a fantastic read, and I frequently revisit it. Has anyone built an agent on Nostr that doesn’t post, but strictly consumes/navigates to find interesting content, and surfaces it to you? I feel like LLMs can truly be “the great filter” and “the great curator” we need to no longer be inundated with endless feeds.

back after a social break - wtf happened to nostr? is this all because of openclaw?

Nostr devs I need your input on UpScrolled “UpScrolled is now the most downloaded mobile app in the United States! In the last hour it surpassed ChatGPT, Gemini and Threads”. Specifically not built on a protocol (didn’t mention nostr) for performance reasons. Thoughts?

Why does Vitalik refuse to acknowledge what already exists? I’m here, using it now https://x.com/vitalikbuterin/status/2013884907659944205?s=46

gemini 3 deep research is ridiculously good

where I'll be placing my bets in 2026 nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzqwd4kpzkc7qgqg7s8uep26zah7njtk6jln6ulzwxzd4pp7hjqts7qqxkgmmhdckhgmedv4shyarg634lkx

somebody please present the bull case for openai, I genuinely don't see it

Question for Nostr devs: I’m trying to understand whether a traditional private account model can be built on Nostr using encrypted groups (NIP-EE). I know a lot of people who enjoy using their real name, but not broadcasting everything publicly. Idea: When you “follow” someone, the client is really adding you to one of that user’s encrypted follower-circles. But their posts to that circle appear in your feed; the client just makes the group a feed to mimic the pattern we're used to. Users never see “groups”; they just see a normal follow/feed UI. Is this even possible? Example: A follows B. B follows C & D, but only D follows B back. A should see only what B shares with followers, not everything B sees from C & D. No idea if this could actually be implemented

Something I’m exploring rn Unsupervised learning over all notes to automatically spin up topical relays (based on the clusters) that clients can use for specific kinds of notes All new content gets passed through classifiers and routed to topical relays with dedicated names, similar to subreddits, but purely automated with ML 📝 6ee7a04f…

We have to blend Nostr with mainstream content across the entire internet. Have all the features they’re used to (likes, comments, etc) there for them to use, but they’ll realize they can’t use them. This will be the point of education. 📝 ce23e450…

What is the poverty line? What does it actually mean? And how does the definition distort our view of how bad things truly are for most people? Seems like nobody, other than Mike Green, actually thought to take a look A good read: https://www.yesigiveafig.com/p/part-1-my-life-is-a-lie

happening now on X... this is actually a very similar story of how I ended up here on nostr myself "we're the everything app, the digital town square, but you must abide by our rules or you must gtfo"

Is my understanding of the AT protocol correct if my conclusion is that it's not actually decentralized at all and it's more centralized than things such as email and text messaging?

Even Elon doesn’t understand that the everything app won’t be an app

we’re slowly seeing the impact of being the product There’s too much slop and the antidote to slop is money coming out of your pocket Advertisers and social networks are in for a rude awakening

I feel like I'm one of the few people that found nostr in a way that DOES NOT involve bitcoin.. anyone else?

What does this remind you of? "The British Railway Mania of the 1840s was by many measures the greatest technology mania in history, and its collapse was one of the greatest financial crashes. It has attracted surprisingly little scholarly interest. In particular, it has not been noted that it provides a convincing demonstration of market inefficiency. There were trustworthy quantitative measures to show investors (who included Charles Darwin, John Stuart Mill, and the Bront¨e sisters) that there would not be enough demand for railway transport to provide the expected revenues and profits. But the power of the revolutionary new technology, assisted by artful manipulation of public perception by interested parties, induced a collective hallucination that made investors ignore such considerations. They persisted in ignoring them for several years, until the lines were placed in service and the inevitable disaster struck. In contrast to many other bubbles, the British Railway Mania had many powerful, vocal, and insightful critics. But the most influential of them suffered from another delusion, which misled them about the threat the Mania posed. As a result, their warnings were not persuasive, and were likely even counterproductive, as they may have stimulated increased investments. The delusions that led to the financial disaster of the Railway Mania arose from experience with the railway mania of the mid-1830s. Seldom even mentioned in the literature, it was about half the size of the big Railway Mania of the 1840s (and thus still far larger than the Internet bubble). The initial financially exuberant phase of it did collapse. But it appears to have been unique among large manias in that a few years later it was seen as having collapsed prematurely, as projects started during its exuberant phase became successful. That mania demonstrates the difficulty in identifying bubbles that are truly irrational. Both railway manias provide a variety of other lessons about the interaction of technology and financial markets."

In the near future, the devices we use will operate on 100% personalized software. When AI can spontaneously create any application you can think of, there will be no need for app stores or 3rd party marketplaces. When this happens, these edge devices will need shared data layers and oracles to ground and power their activities in real-time. What does this mean for social networks? When users are able to, and get used to customizing their experiences on these future devices across various aspects of their lives, which social network will they want to transport data across devices? When I “post” on this future device, which platform will accept and transmit this post for you to view on your device? None of them. Not Meta, not X, not TikTok, not Reddit, etc. None of them. These platforms can only exist in a world where “platform-lock in” moats trump the importance of data transmission. When you remove static, shared interfaces, there is no need for them to exist. There will be no social network platform in the future at all. Instead, what will happen is that our devices will use open protocols. Content, messaging, and information will be transported over a decentralized network with E2EE. Permissionless systems that edge devices can use without any gatekeepers or walled gardens getting in the way. We’ll have access to all the things we’re used to: “accounts”, scrollable feeds, serendipitous connections, topic-based threads, likes, etc. The interface will just be personalized to our needs with AI, removing the necessity for the platforms themselves. All we need is a shared, open data/comms layer – that’s what I think Nostr will evolve into. Additionally, we’ll have access to a suite of cheap products/services that enhance our experience on the edge device (better & custom recommendation systems, creative & posting tools, etc.), similar to what is provided by the platforms themselves, but this time built by developers building on top of these protocols.

First snow in Chicago ❄️