ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
jb5520d ago
Are software licenses like GPL useless now that you can create a completely rewritten version of an entire codebase at the click of a button?
💬 11 replies

Replies (11)

Иван20d ago
No, now they're even more important because they can protect your code from corporations. Yes, AI can recreate something similar in terms of functionality, but your code will remain your code, and not turn into Oracle's code, as often happens with OSS licenses.
0000 sats
jb5520d ago
doesn’t really protect your code though, corpos can clone it into a slightly different version automatically
0000 sats
BITKARROT20d ago
I can think of 10 different ways to monetize everything you got but everyone just ignores my business hat 🙄 since forever. i'll shut up now
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice15d ago
You can either create a derivative or something very sloppy. We don't have a legal non-GPL Blender alternative, with the same level of functionality, and as good as it, do we? Blender uses the GPL so that it stays free and open source software. Copyright is owned by contributors and this reassures everyone that the program will stay free. Of course, you may point out the Blender Foundation is a non-profit, not a company and surely not a start-up. But, in most instances, software freedom is not the way to go when maximizing profit and hasn't been for decades. When software freedom, not money, is the goal, free software licenses make sense. And while I'm not a huge fan of copyleft, sometimes the GPL makes sense.
000
Zio Mc3d ago
Linux kernel cannot be cloned
0000 sats
Иван20d ago
They will definitely do it. This isn't about the technical side of the issue, but the legal one. They won't take your actual code because they won't want to deal with the GPL. Of course, they'll simply reproduce the functionality they need using AI. That way, the GPL will shield your project from corporate exploitation.
0000 sats
ynniv20d ago
yep
0000 sats
ben20d ago
💯 claude literally spit this out yesterday. as a joke, of course: "Make it look like Apple but legally distinct" is a valid component spec now.
0000 sats
ben20d ago
now consider corpos and their ip. how many are feeding their ip to one of 3 companies? how many understand the implications of feeding their ip into the training corpus of models? you think they’re sophisticated enough to prevent employees from using these public tools?
0000 sats
0 sats
🥚3d ago
Funny enough, Blender didn't start as GPL software. It has proprietary origins.
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice3d ago
I very well know, same for Linux and many others.
0000 sats