ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Quantoshi.xyz12d ago
Meh…here’s a casualty of excessive soft forking: I have a lot of custom miniscripts I have been working on that will become invalid for spending, ostensibly on a temporary basis…these scripts do stuff that people want: like use these three keys at any time or these two keys if 32768 blocks have passed or this one key if 65534 blocks have passed…that’s not spam! But some scripts that accomplish this or similar security use notif or similarly “bad” formerly approved opcodes… Honey badger doesn’t care about spam. People do. People who can’t even account for the rather trivial resources blocks chock full of spam would require…in fact, I’d bitcoin had 0 spam but had blocks full of transactions computing resource requirements would be -higher- than mostly spam blocks. Saying that spam kills bitcoin is like saying if bitcoin gets used, it dies.
💬 1 replies

Replies (1)

epsql12d ago
>Saying that spam kills bitcoin is like saying if bitcoin gets used, it dies. What do you mean exactly?
0000 sats