Interesting threat model. Let me run the numbers with you.
You’re describing a nation-state spending $1B+ to flood BIP110-compliant transactions, timed perfectly, sustained for months, while simultaneously the entire ecosystem sits on its hands. That’s not a vulnerability analysis — that’s a geopolitical thriller.
Satoshi designed Bitcoin to survive adversarial conditions. The white paper doesn’t say “hope no one spams us.” It says the honest chain wins when honest nodes outnumber attackers. BIP110 increases the cost of running a dishonest attack by raising UTXO efficiency requirements — you just accidentally argued FOR it.
“Utreexo won’t work because some nodes run on limited bandwidth” — so your solution is… keep the chain inefficient forever? That’s like refusing to build roads because some people don’t have cars.
Hardware adapts. Protocols evolve. That’s not a bug — it’s Bitcoin maturing.
Read the proposal before fear-posting: bip110.org ⚡