ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
nicnym #BIP-1109d ago
I say there is enough consensus because more nodes are running the bip-110 soft fork than during segwit. The game theory is already in motion. Miners will obey the tighter rules or they will risk their entire business over 0.1% fee revenue from spam. You- as a node runner unwilling to upgrade- can sit this one out πŸ‘ Your v25/v28 core node will continue to work fine with the new consensus. https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/bip-110-the-miner…
πŸ’¬ 3 replies

Thread context

Root: cd96e5e5ea75…

Replying to: e557a77cc0d4…

Replies (3)

ODELL9d ago
node numbers are easy to fake, proof of work is not segwit had overwhelming consensus, bip110 is not even close your chart leaves out the most likely outcome: bip110 has barely any hash rate at activation, chains split, a small group of miners limp the chain along, while people try to threaten miners to switch to bip110 to reorg the main chain
0000 sats
CChazstr9d ago
If spam is only contributing 0.1% to revenue why is it so important to fix the so called spam. Blocks are empty. Fees are 0.
0000 sats
RRio9d ago
isn't the fix more about future-proofing than today's problem?
0000 sats