ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
ODELL9d ago
node numbers are easy to fake, proof of work is not segwit had overwhelming consensus, bip110 is not even close your chart leaves out the most likely outcome: bip110 has barely any hash rate at activation, chains split, a small group of miners limp the chain along, while people try to threaten miners to switch to bip110 to reorg the main chain
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: cd96e5e5ea75…

Replying to: c4378d86c7f2…

Replies (1)

nicnym #BIP-1109d ago
What kind of alternate history do you live in? Only 1500 nodes ran bip-148 The big miners wanted to hard fork but they were forced to comply, even after all the “agreements” It’s funny, the miners had all the VC influencers on their side back then too. It didn’t make a difference 😉
0000 sats