ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Stirling Forge18d ago
Well I'm literally saying that. I don't like the temporary nature of it, it does leave it open to interpretation as an attack. But Odell's stance is stupid overall. Core went full tyranny and needs to revert changes at a minimum, should fire Peter Todd also. The BIP shouldn't be temporary at all, though. The changes are good for bitcoin in the BIP. The temporary nature is threatening the safety of the change, IMO.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 43bd5b910fb8…

Replying to: aeec8941b51c…

Replies (1)

Alan18d ago
There are too many valid and invalid reasons for it to be temporary. To me this makes the entire bip flawed. Attackers will want the temporary-ness removed, and midwits will pile on. This is not a clean proposal at all. We need to address the sunk cost fallacy and deal with the fact that Peter Todd did a bad thing, and live with the spam. This wound will only get worse if we keep poking it.
0000 sats