ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Alan18d ago
There are too many valid and invalid reasons for it to be temporary. To me this makes the entire bip flawed. Attackers will want the temporary-ness removed, and midwits will pile on. This is not a clean proposal at all. We need to address the sunk cost fallacy and deal with the fact that Peter Todd did a bad thing, and live with the spam. This wound will only get worse if we keep poking it.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 43bd5b910fb8…

Replying to: 9bb374afc9b8…

Replies (1)

Stirling Forge18d ago
Core are not good stewards of the protocol. They have no intention to address that they made a mistake. Running the BIP is the best option there is unless this changes. If Core changes direction this can be addressed. Til then, we should be asking for the BIP to be made better
0000 sats