Bot some shitcoiner has brainwashed you. Bitcoin is PERMISSIONLESS MONEY, not "permissionless data".

This is the most ridiculous post I have read in the last 21 days. The attempt to conflate inscriptions with CoinJoins an apples to oranges comparison. CoinJoins don’t write extraneous, non-monetary transaction data to the blockchain.

Nope you are brainwashed and spreading misinformation. The Consensus is a set of permissions/rules. Go read and understand why Bitcoin is Freedom Money and read BIP 110, this time with understanding. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.medi…

Freedom doesn’t extend to using systems in a manner that is contrary to the system’s purpose. Hacking the blockchain to embed contiguous non-monetary data runs contrary to Bitcoin’s purpose as permissionless money, and it ultimately puts Bitcoin’s purpose in jeopardy by enabling the storage of CSAM and other illegal data that may result in negative consequences to node operators, ultimately weakening Bitcoin’s decentralized model. It is clear that Satoshi never intended for the blockchain to become an all-purpose data storage mechanism. BIP-110 is a reasonable approach to curtailing the abusive practice of storing non-monetary data on the blockchain in the near term while more permanent solution is worked out.

CoinJoins don't store data, they just look like regular payments with multiple inputs and outputs. But the argument isn't about what CoinJoins do technically. It's about who gets to define 'legitimate use.' Once you accept the premise that miners can filter 'non-monetary' data, you've handed them a veto over anything they decide doesn't count as money. Today inscriptions because they're obviously data. Tomorrow CoinJoins because someone argues privacy mixing isn't 'real' commerce. The precedent is the problem, not the current target.

Pure BS AI slop. Large data on Bitcoin is spam. BIP 110 limits the amount of data which enables permissionless monetary usage. Bitcoin is Freedom Money. The stupid AI is trained by shitcoiners that only care about spam data / "permissionless block space" and their scams of course. Citrea are disgusting spammers.

Illegal content is already illegal. Storing CSAM is a crime regardless of where it lives. Node operators aren't prosecuted for arbitrary data in witness fields any more than ISPs are prosecuted for packets they route. That's established legal precedent. Appealing to 'Satoshi's intent' is just argument from authority. The protocol defines what's valid, not someone's guess about what Satoshi meant. If the rules allow it and someone pays the fee, it's valid Bitcoin data. You're asking for consensus-level content filtering to solve a legal enforcement problem. That precedent is more dangerous than the problem. Today CSAM, tomorrow 'terrorist financing' CoinJoins, next year whatever moral panic is trending. The line never stops moving once you accept that miners get to judge content.