Nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) persisting for weeks. Tremendous dose getting through breast milk. Spike persisting almost a year later. Five peer-reviewed studies show that the DNA contamination is found in patients Kevin McKernan: "Why do we care about this so much? Well, there's all of these papers that have rolled out demonstrating nucleic acid persistence, and I say nucleic acid because we don't know from these papers whether they're measuring DNA or RNA. They used a method known as RT-PCR which which amplifies both. And so many of these papers published before this DNA contamination was known, so they assumed it was the RNA because they were looking at the spike sequence. But if they went back, and tortured that with perhaps primers that looked at the plasmid backbone that's not supposed to be in the vaccine, I'm kind of curious what they would find. "But we have the Krauson paper here that was finding this, what are they, they are out 30 days in heart tissues. There's the Röltgen‬ paper which is out 60 days. "There are all these other papers that found it in placenta two to 10 days [Veronica J. Gonzalez, et. al]. There was found in plasmid from Castruita paper 28 days later in plasma. And then in breast milk there was, this was out to about five days in the Hannah paper. "And the Hannah paper is undermeasuring this. They have a PCR assay that's horribly insensitive; it only has about a 400,000 copy LOD (limit of detection). That should be down at around 10 copies. So their assay for some reason is insensitive to this issue, so I think if they had a more sensitive assay they would have found this out 10, 15 days in breast milk. "Anyway, there's a tremendous dose getting through breast milk. If you add up what's in that paper, the number of feedings that a child has, this is not an insignificant amount as those authors suggest, because they did not consider how much milk a baby drinks over the course of three days, and that would add up to a substantial and sizable dose that that child was getting in that feeding. "Now, very recently, we're also seeing spike protein persistence in these two papers. […] The Yale study actually found it 709 days out, and the Patterson study found it 245 days out. But this is protein that is not going away in 48 hours; it is there almost years later. Why is that? Proteins don't do that. Most proteins have a turnover rate that's in weeks, not years. So this implies something is regenerating the spike protein in your body, or it is evading destruction for long periods of time and certain what reservoirs in the human body. So this leads people to believe perhaps this mRNA is lasting longer, or there's plasmids in there still generating spike, and we don't know the answer to that yet. "So now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately, because this is very recent work. The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. Now we don't know if it's integrated but it's there. And these are studies that weren't looking for it and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. All right, so there's at least five peer-reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated, unvaccinated. And if you dig through that data that's in NCBI, you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients." npub1k8dxqxgnv2p6ymwkamfrx237qjct3zezsx2xevt6z6nzdgalff3qy94qte @ 25:03–28:29 (posted 2025-06-10) https://rumble.com/v6uhd1d-presentation-to-new-zealand-co…