ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
ODELL88d ago
its not backwards compatible for those who do not move to the new signature scheme
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: 270e0bbff5c0…

Replying to: c9d5b743d5f0…

Replies (1)

Jameson Lopp88d ago
Backwards compatibility with regard to forks is taken from the perspective of a node operator rather than a transactor, but yes. Perhaps a new term is necessary.
0000 sats