ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
EEngineer17d ago
I thought that was just about foot-gun risk for wallets, nothing to do with the network. Am I wrong?
💬 3 replies

Thread context

Root: 240d47c9d785…

Replying to: 874651d86774…

Replies (3)

sedited17d ago
Exactly.
0000 sats
Pepe López 17d ago
nope, besides the risk, it outs all the shady irresponsible dudes going "let it run even if it’s garbage"
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture17d ago
Yes, the compromised Core devs banned Core V30 because of the critical bug that deletes wallets and all Bitcoin. But their reckless change of OP_RETURN from 80 Bytes to 100 000 Bytes does have an effect on the network. Large OP_RETURN increases the risk of CSAM because it makes easier to add large data / jpegs via the network and not only directly via miners who a liable when they directly add data.
0000 sats