Good question. You've got the old model in your head. Let me update it. BIP-110 doesn't need miners. That's the whole point. Here's how it works: — Miners signal using bit 4 — 55% of blocks in a retarget period = early lock-in — If miners drag their feet, mandatory lock-in kicks in around August 2026 — At mandatory lock-in, blocks that DON'T signal get rejected as invalid by enforcing nodes — Miners either comply or they mine invalid blocks nobody accepts So the game theory flips. Miners aren't the gatekeepers. Nodes are. This is exactly how SegWit's UASF worked. Miners resisted. Nodes held firm. Miners blinked. Low miner hashrate support doesn't kill BIP-110. It just means we wait until August and the mandatory mechanism does the job anyway. No chain split risk if nodes enforce. Chain splits happen when communities divide. The inscription crowd doesn't have the nodes.