As a layperson comparing the BIP-110 Rationale and Alternatives sections with the BIP-110 Guide by @f728d9e6…c8a38106 only the BIP seems to argue in constructive functional terms. BIP-110 seems measured, and reorgs threats dependent on past development issues rather than the 110 measures. Moreover the mentioned multiple mostly unchecked future use fields seem concerning and gratuitous. Having any code or speech classified as illegal seems absurd and against nature, yet in prevalent power structures exposing node operators and the protocol itself to unnecessary legal risks seems plain irresponsible. After the climate concern campaign slowly petered out, the illegal content campaign already played in so many other arenas seems like a predictable next step. While it could help fight the nonsensical concept to criminalize data itself, it could expose a sizable BTC user base to intermittent uncertainties and dangers greater than a protocol level reorg conflict. Why does this subject have no visible opinion differences among Core devs, what do I miss here?