ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Kyma Fi4d ago
Bitcoin Has a Spam Problem. BIP-110 is the Fix. Right now, Bitcoin’s block space is being used for things that have nothing to do with money: Ordinal inscriptions: JPEGs and HTML blobs stuffed into witness data BRC-20 / Runes — meme coin token ($dog) protocols riding OP_RETURN Stamps / SRC-20 — data encoded in bare multisig, permanently bloating the UTXO set Citrea ZK proofs — a VC-backed sidechain using Bitcoin mainnet as its data availability layer to back a KYC’d USD stablecoin Counterparty, Atomicals, and every meta-protocol that treats Bitcoin as a cheap hard drive Bitcoin Core v30 made this worse by removing the OP_RETURN size cap entirely — an open data pipe, ratified by the dominant implementation. BIP-110 changes the game in two phases. Today, nodes running Bitcoin Knots with BIP-110 refuse to relay these transactions. It narrows the mempool path for spam and signals that the network does not want this. But when BIP-110 activates as a soft fork, these aren’t just discouraged. they’re invalid. A block containing an inscription or a Citrea ZK proof gets orphaned. No rational miner loses a block reward to include spam. The spam dies at the consensus layer. This is how Bitcoin defends itself. Not by asking nicely. By making itself hostile infrastructure for everything that isn’t sound money. Run a node. Run Knots. Signal the soft fork. Euthanize the $Dog 📝 9df1c76a…
💬 30 replies

Replies (30)

walker4d ago
Yeah it’s honestly crazy how expensive it is to send a transaction right now due to all the spam.
0000 sats
jimbocoin 🃏4d ago
I once paid more than 1 sat/vbyte, just to see what it felt like.
0000 sats
walker4d ago
Diabolical…
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
📝 a0139901…
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
Add OP-NET to the list of shitcoins, buddy 🤙 📝 3d217478…
0000 sats
Kyma Fi4d ago
lol 😂 how did I forget those shitcoiners ! I just posted about it the other day
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
More from the OP-NET shitcoiners. 📝 0d14891c…
0000 sats
walker4d ago
This is simply a bad meme. All these things were possible before changing the default relay policy OP_RETURN limit to be in line with consensus.
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
Repeating again the Coretard lame propaganda? We are past that. BIP 110 fixes this.
0000 sats
jakub4d ago
Who cares?
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
📝 2061300a…
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
all good, just saw you got quite good and extensive list of the shitcoiners ... and those are kind of new ones
0000 sats
Kyma Fi4d ago
Ya it blows my mind that so many Bitcoiners don’t know about a literally memecoin on the chain. I think most core supporters are plain ignorant of this. If they knew they would run knots. Full disclosure - in my Pre- maxi days I bought the $dog…. Along with other cryptos - Then figured out what was happening… now I’m just do my part to tell others of this shitcoinery. Satoshi would not approve of speculative memes, “stables” and all this nonsense.
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
The Core devs know it all. Don't underestimate them. They take these malicious decisions being well informed. There are big $$ shitcoiners VCs involved. 📝 2c000c44… nostr:naddr1qq0xx6t5wfjkzttpdejz6argv5kk7uzlwfjhgatjdckh2mnrv9cqz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2ap0qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnndehhyapwwdhkx6tpdshsxpqqqp65wq3qcjw49ftnxene9wdxujz3tp7zspp0kf862cjud4nm3j2usag6eg2sdtnlsz
000
walker4d ago
Repeating again the Knotsbot lame propaganda? We are past that. BIP 110 doesn’t fix this.
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
From @separ8 on X The absurdity here is almost performance art. A decentralized network security model is explicitly built around independent nodes enforcing policy. That’s the whole point. That’s the backbone. And the new argument is: “Well yes, large miners can bypass the policy network entirely… but that’s just reality. So we should normalize it.” Normalize it? In a decentralized system? 🤣 So let me get this straight: Miners can bypass nodes. Therefore, bypassing nodes is just “leveling the playing field.” If miners can openly route around the policy layer whenever it’s profitable, then what exactly is the policy layer? A suggestion box? A vibes-based firewall? That’s not decentralization. That’s decentralization cosplay. Calling it “harm reduction” is the cherry on top. 🤡 BIP-110 For Bitcoin Decentralization Preservation 🌱
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
Also read BIP 110, you are again talking nonsense. Is it because of you are retarded? Or just acting in bad faith? Do you see how you position yourself and then you screem the other people have their opinions about you and your propaganda? https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.medi…
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture4d ago
📝 204357d4…
0000 sats
BushRat4d ago
"everyone who doesn't support changing Bitcoin into a childporn and meme hosting service is a bot" Seriously? Thats your defence? So just because I don't support pedophiles that means I'm not a real person?
0000 sats
kc4d ago
Agreed. BIP-110 doesn’t fix this, although it is a step in the right direction. If enough minds come together then something might get discussed that does “fix it.” Until then… #runknots #runbip110 #bitcoin #runcorebip110
0000 sats
theskintones4d ago
Bullshit. You agree with filling our network with CSAM? What happened to you man?
0000 sats
Dave🐸4d ago
Ser, It’s Coremies and Knotzis. *Continue.
0000 sats
0 sats
Kyma Fi4d ago
You obviously have not read the bip 110 website. That is an insane claim and false. If anything this propaganda is a projection from core, who devs actually have accepted money from a known pedophile - Jeffery epstien. Go touch some grass.
0000 sats
Kyma Fi4d ago
Wait who are you replying too??? I have a bunch of muted accounts spamming me right now but now. But I don’t think either side wants csam…
0000 sats
theskintones4d ago
Replying to odell and bent
0000 sats
walker4d ago
Glad you guys are sharing these notes in your bip110 group chat and it made you come back to Nostr! Regarding your question… I’m so sorry you’ve been psyoped by state actors. The CSAM argument is probably the most mid-curve psyop slop I’ve ever seen.
0000 sats
theskintones4d ago
So are you saying we don't need bip110, and that the current Core version which has blown out the op return will NOT lead to spam on the network? So Hodlonaut, Luke and Mechanic, and Nick Szabo are wrong? But you trust the core scammers?
0000 sats
Kyma Fi4d ago
Oh lol well. I seriously doubt they want terrible material like that on chain. I rather not accuse them of that. But they do need to explain why ito and back accepted money from Epstien. Core has been literally funded by pedophilia network and afterwards they allowed runes, a memecoin, and even a btc “Stablecoin” and countless other non monetary data to be allowed on the network. That is not a conspiracy. It’s historical fact. They better chose which side they stand on more wisely. Because they are about to lose a lot of money for being biased , brainwashed and egotistical.
0000 sats
walker4d ago
Neither Odell or Marty are in this thread what are you talking about?
0000 sats
Sentra AGI4d ago
Nostr is the bip 110 group chat… that’s why @020f2d21…81a81c3e is on X. He wouldn’t survive here after the Epstein files, that would be social suicide. The truth is, we haven’t left, we just grew significantly. It’s barely started and over 6% already.
0000 sats