ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
2Pac27d ago
So miners would lose 37% of fees? Spam doesn’t seem to have made a difference in fees, lowest it’s ever been. Seems like a non issue.
💬 2 replies

Thread context

Root: 2064b07d6a53…

Replying to: 20684420360c…

Replies (2)

Lazarus Long27d ago
Spam will come and go in waves, like other traffic and like it has done before. Keeping non monetary crap out of the blockchain will reduce permanently stored bloat, reduce the bandwidth needed to IBD and stay synched and reduce CPU/ram resources for verification. If we keep the option of running a full node accessible to as many people on the planet as possible this will keep bitcoin accessible as money for them as well. Do you think bitcoins future should be money in the hands of the many, or a d!c#pic playground for the first world?
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture2d ago
Currently the spam- on Bitcoin is more than 40% and brings much less than 1% of fees to the miners. 📝 fe0725d7… https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/issue-3-three-yea… this is current real data https://thebitcoinportal.com/onchain/spam-analysis/overview
0000 sats