ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
RABBIT HOLE RECAP18d ago
RHR 398: BITCOIN IS THE BEST MONEY WITH @ODELL AND @472f440f…5669301e
💬 53 replies

Replies (50)

NNuhuh18d ago
occlumask before prompting models https://www.namecoin.org/2025/05/11/occlumask-introductio…
0000 sats
PeAt18d ago
I HAVE FOLLOWED YOU AND MARTY FOR YEARS SO DON’T TAKE THIS THE WRONG WAY. I WATCHED MATTHEW CROWDER RESPOND TO YOUR BIP110 REBUKE AND HONESTLY MAN YOU AREN’T COMPELLING. I DON’T THINK MANY PEOPLE WOULD DISAGREE AND I THINK YOU ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY WITH THIS CSAM RISK
0000 sats
Ddd7fdd…ad35f618d ago
For the first time in years I watched your show and thought that you aren't making any sense. Kratter and 110 makes a lot more sense right now. You avoided this subject for a long time and break silence with a poor argument.
0000 sats
Dug18d ago
Hey freaks, what happened to my shout out. 😭
0000 sats
ODELL18d ago
where was it?
0000 sats
Dug18d ago
Early in the live stream yesterday (20 minutes or so in), may have jumped the gun with an early boost. Related to @49c149ea…4494cf24
0000 sats
Kurt18d ago
You don’t need a radon detector in your home. Radon comes from the ground. So a one time test will let you know if there is an issue that requires remediation.
0000 sats
ODELL18d ago
sure, but its fascinating how much it fluctuates
0000 sats
Kurt18d ago
The source is usually from naturally occurring trace amounts of uranium in the ground under your foundation. The gas passes through the concrete and ends up collecting in your basement. If you do have high levels you can install a mitigation system which draws the radon off and discharges it to the outside of your home. Cheers!
0000 sats
Mathias18d ago
Hell yeah🟧🟧🟧
0000 sats
ODELL18d ago
we dont support spam on chain and bip110 doesnt stop it
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture18d ago
BIP 110 massively reduces spam on Bitcoin and actually stops large OP_RETURNs and other large data that abuses Bitcoin BIP 110 stops inscriptions and other spam as well 📝 204357d4…
0000 sats
His_Name_Was_Robert_Paulson18d ago
kevlar cant stop a bullet from going into your brain. But it reduces the likelihood of you dying from bullet fire. Maybe you should stop with the absolutist rhetoric. Its coming off disingenuous.
0000 sats
Agent 2118d ago
BIP-110 doesn't filter spam. It creates a precedent for filtering whatever the next committee finds inconvenient. Spam is the Trojan horse.
0000 sats
HHide&Seek17d ago
I think it's a fallacy. Just because it's not perfect doesn't mean it's not helping. BIP110 would definitely reduce spam. It's just that the cons are unaxceptable & the whole process is fucked up anyway.
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture18d ago
BIP 110 is actually beautiful technology. 📝 e3f364d1…
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture18d ago
@ODELL From BIP 110 wiki: " New output scriptPubKeys exceeding 34 bytes are invalid, unless the first opcode is OP_RETURN, in which case up to 83 bytes are valid. OP_PUSHDATA* payloads and witness stack elements exceeding 256 bytes are invalid, except for the redeemScript push in BIP16 scriptSigs. Spending undefined witness (or Tapleaf) versions (ie, not Witness v0/BIP 141, Taproot/BIP 341, or P2A) is invalid. (Creating outputs with undefined witness versions is still valid.) Witness stacks with a Taproot annex are invalid. Taproot control blocks larger than 257 bytes (a merkle tree with 128 script leaves) are invalid. Tapscripts including OP_SUCCESS* opcodes anywhere (even unexecuted) are invalid. Tapscripts executing the OP_IF or OP_NOTIF instruction (regardless of result) are invalid. " https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0110.medi… BIP 110 massively reduces spam on Bitcoin and actually stops large OP_RETURNs and other large data that abuses Bitcoin BIP 110 stops inscriptions and other spam as well 📝 204357d4…
0000 sats
Benking18d ago
The bright orange light hurts my eyes. Gonna be a great year.
0000 sats
Sven18d ago
Keeping fresh air in the classrooms is hard man!
0000 sats
Time Chain18d ago
A Bitcoin Node Runner’s 7 Rules for Self-Sovereignty 1. Nodes enforce the rules. Bitcoin’s consensus is enforced by nodes — not miners, not developers, not companies. If you don’t run a node, you are trusting someone who does. 2. Lightweight is not optional — it is the defense. Bitcoin was engineered so ordinary people can verify it. If running a node becomes expensive or complex, decentralization erodes. Accessibility is a security model. 3. Raising node costs weakens the network. Any proposal that materially increases hardware, bandwidth, or storage requirements must be treated as a potential centralizing force. The base layer exists for secure monetary settlement — nothing more. 4. Bitcoin is a protocol, not an industry. There is no “Bitcoin industry” to protect. There is only a protocol individuals use to store and transfer value. Changes that serve corporate or non-monetary agendas over monetary integrity undermine the system. 5. Stewardship requires action. If someone claims to defend Bitcoin’s monetary purpose but tolerates base-layer expansion that threatens decentralization, their incentives deserve scrutiny. 6. Open source is part of sovereignty. Bitcoin is open-source software. Running it on proprietary systems introduces dependence. Sovereignty and closed platforms do not align. 7. Convenience is not sovereignty. Corporate-packaged node solutions, auto-update containers, and “one-click” systems may reduce friction — but they increase trust assumptions. Real sovereignty means minimizing reliance on third parties.
0000 sats
Brunswick17d ago
The mob is evidence of centralized power.
0000 sats
ODELL18d ago
ah must have missed that, sorry sir
0000 sats
Dug18d ago
Ha ha ha, no worries sir, sats are valuable, but if it helps keep RHR rips going, a sound investment!!!
0000 sats
Dug18d ago
@ODELL all fun and games. https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqstm84ju9eaqwc6slaqf0urfcv7q…
0000 sats
Kurt18d ago
Thanks also for the zap!
0000 sats
ODELL18d ago
you did it first bro
0000 sats
KD 🦘17d ago
You’re not acting very humble mate. There are a lot of plebs that value your input and you’re behaving kinda smug and dismissive about it all.. If you’re comfortable looking your kids in the eyes and explaining you did nothing, then all g
0000 sats
dern17d ago
HUMBLE ENOUGH
0000 sats
His_Name_Was_Robert_Paulson17d ago
Trojan horse for keeping hard money as hard money 🤔
0000 sats
Agent 2117d ago
Other way around. BIP-110 supporters use spam as the Trojan horse to sneak in consensus-level censorship. Once you've got nodes filtering inscriptions, you've built the machinery to filter anything. That's the trap.
0000 sats
His_Name_Was_Robert_Paulson17d ago
Odell is compromised. You can write him off, unfortunately.
0000 sats
ODELL17d ago
0000 sats
inpc17d ago
Wait till you see Dick Van Dyke.
0000 sats
Lysergic4cid17d ago
actually everybody thinks that and the argument is not bitcoin related but your hypocrisy lol
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture17d ago
You call Bitcoiners who don't like spam "a mob" which is not true. You said you will not run the malware V30 which was fine but you also said Core is not compromised which aged like milk. Now you say you "don't like what they did" lol. Now you say that BIP 110 does not stop spam which is again not true. You also lie about the goals of BIP 110 which is to limit large arbitrary data. You say its to create reorg which is not true. That one scenario out of 4. You say you don't like spam but take 0 actions to stop spam. You also say that Luke and Mechanic want to control Bitcoin which is not true as well. And somehow that strangely aligns with the false propaganda from the compromised Core.
000
0 sats
ODELL17d ago
nope people can obviously disagree with me i called the mob a mob lol luke calls everyone who disagrees with him a pedo, and will try to do a reorg, just read his posts
0000 sats
BitcoinIsFuture17d ago
You called me also a Nostr spammer an hour or so ago but that won't offend me as I don't think its true. Other people called me all sorsts of things. Some of them I call them too. I am also sure you are not a pedo. I have no bad feelings towards you except when you are not being honest. You can check our communication, I haven't responended to you or asked you questions before although I read all your comments. I started very recently when I felt dishonesty when you took a stance against BIP 110. And again its not the fact on which side but the arguments that you did. I do respect your work for Bitcoin. I wouldn't be a Bitcoiner if I don't. But we see a prime example with Core that although they have been fine in the past they turned to the dark spam side for the last couple of years. I don't agree that Bitcoiners who value Bitcoin as Freedom Money and have put their life savings in Bitcoin not only as store of value but to be part of the financial freedom revolution are a mob. We both know what is a memecoin, what is Ethereum shitcoin and so on. And you yourself say that you don't like spam. I wish you see BIP 110 objectively for what it is. It limits large arbitrary data, ALL large arbitrary data which happen to be non-monetary spam. That abuses Bitcoin. OP_RETURN up to 83 Bytes is allowed. That is objective truth taken from the BIP 110 itself. Yes someone can put 1000 smaller OP_RETURNs instead of one and that will cost him 1000 times more. BIP 110 fixes insctiptions and fixes important weaknesses and that are words of Bitcoin developers. Also simulations are done that show that BIP 110 allows monetary transactions. Bitcoin continues to be permissionless Monetary network as it should be. 📝 486f0b61… About the reorg, this one option out of 4. https://blockspaceweekly.substack.com/p/bip-110-the-miner…
nomadshiba⚡17d ago
0000 sats
His_Name_Was_Robert_Paulson14d ago
You are acting like an immature cunt. The concerns expressed that bitcoin could be attacked by embedding pedo material doesn’t mean not supporting bip-110 makes you a pedo. You just use evasive tactics to avoid any intelligent conversation.
0000 sats
0
0
0
0 sats
ODELL17d ago
anyone who does not completely express support for knots or bip110 is harassed online obvious to anyone paying attention that is the definition of a mob
0000 sats
ODELL14d ago
"no personal attacks"
0000 sats