ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
the axiom16d ago
"I waited two months to say anything, now I'm sure I know the future, and my opinion is the same as every other person" 📝 1caf2855…
💬 14 replies

Replies (14)

Stefan16d ago
Gotem
0000 sats
gladstein16d ago
Normally I’d share thoughts the whole time as I go as I experiment with something Not this time
0000 sats
mleku16d ago
and people call me crazy. cloud ai is immutable. no learning. a potential back channel. stick to code.
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice16d ago
Checks all boxes. Talks about a slopbot as if it were a human. "Freedom tech" but advises shit by OpenAI and Anthropic, along with Gmail and freaking Apple devices. The full stack is proprietary, but advocates paying for it with Bitcoin. Can't even code, but has opinions about computers. As usual, the "current thing" is noise.
0000 sats
the axiom16d ago
2 months is still nothing 2 more months and we may have yet another paradigm change as someone will figure out how to turn LLM babble into clickable buttons
0000 sats
gladstein16d ago
It has been a crazy 2 months. Haven’t felt this speed of change in a very long time
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice16d ago
Code is the best interface.
0000 sats
gladstein16d ago
My bot ain’t no slopbot, watch your mouth Yes you need to experience the best in the world models to feel the edge But pay in bitcoin if you want to avoid KYC I’ve had opinions about computers since I built my own in the 90s as a kid
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice16d ago
> watch your mouth I watched my mouth and it said "idiotic sewage slopbot", you're right, I'll make sure to write it in full next time. > I’ve had opinions about computers since I built my own in the 90s as a kid Very nice, but you can't write or read code, so you can't assess its quality. You can't think in code, so you can't have computational ideas.
0000 sats
gladstein16d ago
Nonsense. I am already writing code and I’ll write plenty more moving forward. Just in a new way
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice16d ago
But you can't read it, you said it yourself. It's not a new way to write code, it's a new way to be illiterate while reusing other's code, sometimes a bit scrambled and patched here and there. Which is fine, I use software libraries all the time, which I didn't write, I just don't pretend I'm their author (except when I actually am). If you cannot *think* in code you literally cannot have many computational ideas that those who do write code can have. The "new way" you are referring to is by writing in natural language, is it not? Many ideas are much easier to describe in code than they are in natural language. You wouldn't know or understand this because you can't have such ideas. It's those who do have such ideas that move software forward, not those who build the next app none asked for on top of them. Even without new computational ideas, if you cannot read code, you cannot asses its quality. You can, of course, see that a program appears to behave as intended, but that's not the same as its codebase being a high-quality one. It especially isn't when it comes straight from a slopbot.
00
0
0 sats
VValentino Giudice16d ago
Also, "plenty more"? While plenty? As a general (but far from absolute) rule, the more code you need, the worse it is.
0000 sats
gladstein16d ago
You’re already wrong, I wrote very helpful novel software that did not yet exist within like the first few days of using openclaw
0000 sats
VValentino Giudice16d ago
I never said generated software couldn't be helpful, so I don't know what you're even trying to reply to. It is a statistical interpolation of existing code, however, and the range of possibilities is limited by that distribution, as you'd know if you knew how neural networks work. A computational idea isn't an idea about a new app, for fuck's sake. The vast majority of apps never require any novel computational ideas, not in the last few decades. And low-quality code can obviously be helpful if it runs correctly. It slowly deteriorates the whole system as it gets bigger and its role becomes more central, but it will at least appear useful in the meanwhile.
000
0 sats