Is programmable money bad?

I have been paying attention. Core 30 controversy is literally a change to a default setting that does nothing to change consensus. Any tx that was getting through is still getting through and any tx that was not getting through is still not getting through. If you run an old version of core, knots, v30 default settings, v30 w modified settings nothing has changed. Peter theil and citrea (obviously) are complete shitstains but I'm not sure the point you are trying to make... Knots was supposed to fix the "spam problem" and "save Bitcoin" but it didn't do a damn thing. V30 was supposed break Bitcoin and make it impossible to use as money but the fee market is essentially non existent rn. Excuse me if I'm not up in arms and interested in another "solution"(especially one as extreme and half baked as rdts) from those claiming the sky is falling.

It’s not mentioned in that post. Is it somewhere else such you can link to

What point are you trying to make? If you're against Thiel and Citrea then you're against Bitcoin? It was a stupid gatcha question. I would say "be better" but from past exchanges I know that's impossible for you.

If it is used for monetary transactions yes, if it is used to store big data, inscriptions, degenerate jpegs and other spam then NO. The problem is that this is the new SLopp shitcoiner narrative that excuses spam and obfuscates Bitcoin use as Freedom Money. BIP 110 is another answer for you. And Bitcoin Knots.

Agreed. The only change I'd prefer is CTV+CSFS. And I don't inscribe. Were you going to answer the question?

I do not. Did you mean to ask average_bitcoiner? Also I'm aware of Kratter's association with Theil and while that's embarrassing, I'm glad he's publicly disclosed it and no longer supports Thiel.

No but i support programmable money aka Bitcoin.