1/ GZ takes the BIP 110 position that spam exists, it's bad, and filtering it out is not censorship. 2/ GZ spoke out against core v30 changing op_return, before its release, agreeing with the BIP 110 camp that it was unnecessary and controversial. 3/ GZ is put off by the CSAM argument because CSAM is "not well defined" and claims showing an image of a crime is not a crime. While this is certainly true in the case of Hiroshima, CSAM is not just a physical crime, it is also a digital crime. The acts of sharing and viewing such images are themselves criminal acts. Disturbingly, GZ claims CSAM as a moral issue is "up for debate." 4/ GZ claims BIP 110 would reduce CSAM propagation from 200/hour to 100/hour. This is false and ludicrous. Core expanding op_return to 100k bytes makes possible contiguous CSAM images; reducing op_return to previous levels (80 bytes) eliminates that possibly completely, from 100% possible to 0% possible. 5/ GZ claims there are "many reasons" why it is "nonsense" that you can put contiguous CSAM into 100kb op_return, but fails to provide even one piece of evidence (or logic) to back that self-evidently ridiculous claim. 6/ GZ spends the next several minutes expressing dismay at being attacked despite being a vocal participant in a heated debate. These final statements have nothing to do with the argument. My conclusion is that CZ is mostly aligned with the BIP 110 camp, but he illogically and mysteriously doesn't seem to view contiguous images in a 100kb op_return as possible and therefore not a threat vector. He also ignores that reducing op_return to pre-v30 levels will reduce non-illegal spam by 100x or more, not just 2x.