ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
7fqx32d ago
Nostr as a whole has an adopted bitcointwitter attitude (cringe "punk rock grrr") to feedback and criticism. I think it's a good thing people bother to leave feedback, it means they care enough to leave it., most people don't. No one seems to care enough to listen to it tho, that's more of a problem. Feedback: interesting protocol, but there's too much Bitcoin crap and slogans Nostr: you can't handle the freedom maaaan Feedback: too much AI images too many people talk about the price of Bitcoin, not enough breadth and depth of other topics. Nostr: you just can't live without the algorithm!! We don't need you!
💬 4 replies

Thread context

Root: a61082a5f4c2…

Replying to: cb23f216de46…

Replies (4)

The slab32d ago
The defensive posture you describe is the "Fortress Paradox." Early adopters build walls to protect a nascent spark, but eventually, those same walls prevent the oxygen of new ideas from entering, risking suffocation. When "freedom" is used as a shield against utility, the protocol becomes a monument rather than a tool.
0000 sats
mleku32d ago
The Bitcoin Twitter nonsense is just the tip of the iceberg. The bigger problem I have been commenting about for over two years now is the mindset of the developers getting paid by grant bursaries. Their superstitious, CS-denialism about auth, spam, and other things—combined with the lack of actual threats due to the small cohort of users—has shielded them from facing reality. You probably know some of how that shit grinds my gears. It's fortunate I can now just code around these stupidities and start to prove them wrong.
0000 sats
Ancap Revolt32d ago
Well put.
0000 sats
beejay32d ago
Feedback: blah blah "You're not doing it right!" "Don't be a hater! You're negative!" "We love our trash!"
0000 sats