ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Stirling Forge18d ago
Obviously I wasn't meaning "fired" as in you or Opensats are paying him. Just saying I think he definitely shouldn't be a maintainer on core like he is, though. No keys, no moderation powers. Addressing the rot in Core is Core's problem ultimately, though, not yours. All I'm saying is the best thing the Anti-BIP110 can do is call for Core rot to be cleaned up and the controversial relay policy change reversed. It's simple, clean and avoids most of the civil war headache. Wishing for a new implementation to pop out of thin air with honorable devs who can be trusted fully seems like lottery odds before BIP activation. At the point where we're a month from activation and nothing happens, I'm just gonna keep running the BIP. It's better than the alternative which is Core being allowed to play tyrant without any backlash at all. 🤷‍♂️
💬 2 replies

Thread context

Root: 43bd5b910fb8…

Replying to: 7662f89e14e4…

Replies (2)

Iihsotas17d ago
The best thing would be the 110 enjoorers to sack up and hard fork. It would solve everyone’s problem.
0000 sats
ODELL17d ago
peter todd is not a core maintainer he manages an implementation called librerelay that is basically the opposite of knots
0000 sats