ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
lkraider31d ago
I have become at peace with both models. They function at different levels of reality, globe Earth is sustainable as a breakdown low level physics model, while flat Earth is intrinsically more powerful as metaphysics. Once you understand metaphysics is above and science is below, they each fall into place. The hard part is building bridges between them, because if you discuss metaphysical claims on low level reality it becomes incompatible, same for trying to use low level reality to explain metaphysical patterns, they don’t.
πŸ’¬ 2 replies

Thread context

Root: 44ecc6a212a9…

Replying to: 9735b2638bc5…

Replies (2)

Eede3d9…79538231d ago
It's not hard. Even creationism makes sense in a simulation. It's the loading time of the software that brings you the age of empires on this planet. Just use a bigger framework and you can combine otherwise exclusive perspectives.
0000 sats
Hanshan31d ago
You can just say "it's my faith" and there's no problem with that. It's when people argue that it explains physical, observational data that there's a problem.
0000 sats