ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
ODELL189d ago
i do not feel comfortable telling people to run knots until it has better review and release processes in place if you do not want to relay larger op return transactions then run core v29 (the most recent version of core) and do not update to v30 when it is released alternatively you can run v30 with a modified config file i think luke, mechanic, and most core contributors mean well and care about bitcoin long term i want to see more well reviewed bitcoin implementations exist, more choices for node operators is strictly better, this is one of the reasons i have donated my time to build out opensats i think this ‘debate’ has mostly devolved into social attacks and is mostly unproductive i do not think it matters much for the global bitcoin network which client you run, in this specific situation i have said much on this topic in the past, use the search feature if you are curious
💬 13 replies

Replies (13)

roscoclyde189d ago
I’ve been curious your opinion on the matter. Thank you. 🤝
0000 sats
Eric FJ 🪬⚡️189d ago
This is lucid
0000 sats
bitcoinpoorguy 比特幣傢伙189d ago
Fair enough 🫡
0000 sats
scrolls of ancient wisdom189d ago
This is opinion is natural to slightly biased to core. The reason why people are running knots even without the best review is because we feel offended and betrayed.
0000 sats
Joseph Hurtado - Founder Granata Consulting189d ago
Who reviews core? Knots is a minor fork of Core.
0000 sats
dagwood189d ago
Cooler heads prevail. Best "NOT TWITTER" explanation I have seen.
0000 sats
Winston189d ago
Well said. The voice of reason.
0000 sats
marksn189d ago
a 💯 . right now it’s a distraction imho
0000 sats
Skanderbeg189d ago
Or just update to v30 and change the datacarrier limit. Keeps OP_RETURN limits as is.
0000 sats
BitcoinSandy189d ago
Wen taproot ? Or am i late ? That’s about where I am 😂
0000 sats
pedro189d ago
you're talking about long term, but do you think core 30 may cause a short/mid term problem though? we have a precedent with what happened on bsv, when they raised op return to 100kb and i don't understand yet why this huge risk is being taken so lightly. "just don't update your node" won't be helpful, when other people do update and stuff ends up on a block
0000 sats
Force2B189d ago
Good call
0000 sats
Branca187d ago
All it takes is one miner not using OP_RETURN filters for all nodes, including yours, to store illicit material. This is the only argument they should refute or substantiate much better. At this point, and given what's happening, I think influential people are definitely compromised.
0000 sats