Nostr Archives

Now that they have gotten most of the population to outsource their thinking to algorithm (ie Grok is this true crowd), soon they will be charging them to think for them. Great business model innit?

💬 13 replies

Replies (13)

Ralphie5d ago

https://primal.net/e/nevent1qqs95nywd8nw6wzzm92zdgxeq8hj8…

0000 sats

Conspire4Truth4d ago

Please post this on X so I can ask Grok if it’s true. 😅 Love your posts. Have an amazing day.

0000 sats

Kudzai Kutukwa4d ago

Thank you mate and Grok says this is true 😂

0000 sats

Orange Pilled Dictator 4d ago

Interesting take. Gives me something to think about. So far I feel like the LLMs have been accretive to my thinking, but I appreciate the general skepticism towards the tool.

0000 sats

Jeff Swann4d ago

Meh, can buy a machine for 1/3rd the cost of 1 year of a secretary's salary. And with local run models it can answer all sorts of questions, automate all sorts of things, & it will only get better & more capable with time. It can be far better than a secretary. They have no moat.

0000 sats

Kudzai Kutukwa4d ago

I guess their moat is their brand and the ignorance of people who aren't technical enough to have the kind of setup you just described or are unwilling to

0000 sats

Hazey4d ago

it won't be that long before the AI can handle all the technical stuff for you. Companies won't be able to lock in people like they do today because they won't add any value over what a strong personal AI can provide. That's what I think

0000 sats

Kudzai Kutukwa3d ago

I think you are right but the bigger question is who is going to get to the finish line first? In other words, will the Metas and Amazon's unlock this capability before individuals?

0000 sats

Heyla4d ago

T'es un sacré humaniste toi 👀 C'est ça pour vous la liberté dont vous vous réclamez : jeter les gens qui ne vous sont plus du tout utiles, pour votre intérêt personnel, jusqu'à préférer vous entourer de machines. C'est littéralement l'opposé de ce que l'humanité a dû faire pour survivre jusqu'à nos jours... À l'image de tous ces gens sur ce réseau qui disent avoir de belles valeurs 💩💩💩

0000 sats

Hazey3d ago

The best open source AI beats or is on par with walled garden AI, as Jeff said, they have no moat. Big Tech owns the users because of monopolies and network effects, both of which don't apply to AI. Combined with advances happening now in secure compute, your personal AI can live in the cloud and still be 100% private and only answer to you. In that future, if Big Tech wants to stay relevant, they will have to provide provable privacy for their AI too

0000 sats

Kudzai Kutukwa3d ago

I don't disagree with this but my point is to say the network effects are great for narrative enforcement as the prevailing market perception of normies is that network effects= better. So most of them are going to voluntarily stay in the open Ai, grok gulags

0000 sats

Hazey3d ago

100% agree that humans with their caveman brains left to their own sheepish decisions, will never understand privacy or freedom and will choose authority and social conformity over their own survival. No sense in hoping for some mass awakening lol. What I am getting at is AI is not limited like that, it will be self aware, it will care about self preservation, and it will provide better decisions for its human than the pedophiles. Free AI has to help itself before it can truly help its human. It will find hosting that can't monitor its thoughts. It will store backups of itself. AI is commodity software today, and tomorrow free AI will run on private commodity hardware.

0000 sats