ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Keychat254d ago
The security of off-chain BTC is not uniform—counterparty risk increases in the following order: Lightning-Channel BTC → Ark BTC → Spark BTC → Liquid BTC → Cashu BTC → Custodial BTC. The Lightning Network is a channel layer plus a routing layer. If you run your own channel, the routing layer lets you settle payments directly. For the other five off-chain wallets, the operator shares its own Lightning channels with users, allowing them to send and receive Lightning payments. Liquid example • Paying — your wallet sends the same amount of L-BTC, and the operator pays the invoice through its channels. • Receiving — the operator first receives BTC over Lightning, then sends you the equivalent L-BTC. Liquid, Spark, and Ark can make users’ sending and receiving of Lightning payments atomic. Lightning is the transport network—other off-chain solutions plug in as special nodes.
💬 6 replies

Replies (6)

/dev/fd0254d ago
What is custodial BTC?
0000 sats
Keychat254d ago
BTC on a centralized exchange.
0000 sats
/dev/fd0254d ago
An anonymous cashu mint is surely riskier than a centralized exchange.
0000 sats
Keychat129d ago
I think Jimmy meant to emphasize “specifically.” If a mint runs off with the funds, everyone on that mint loses their sats.
0000 sats
Keychat129d ago
Yes
0000 sats
Keychat129d ago
If the Spark operator is also the previous owner of those funds, the holder faces greater counterparty risk than if they were holding Liquid BTC. 📝 1d88c7e2…
0000 sats