ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Ssatoshi jr24d ago
Ok let's say Odell is right and its an attack on bitcoin. You get a minority of node runners running a soft fork and reorg the chain by legally threatening miners by spamming the non fork chain with csam. If that's an valid attack surface how do you prevent governments from doing it a hell of a lot more effectively? @04c915da…3dfbecc9 @84630768…fa019ae8 @472f440f…5669301e
💬 3 replies

Replies (3)

Ee8fdea…35e5c424d ago
I've been working on a new electronic cash system that's fully peer-to-peer.
0000 sats
Ssatoshi jr24d ago
Dad you're already gone
0000 sats
Scrotus23d ago
That's a pretty good question. I think creating division in the Bitcoin culture and convincing a bunch of plebs they are on a holy war makes the attack more likely to succeed... Not unlike some weird social engineering attack. Now Unless things drastically change it will fail miserably, but the more "support" they can gin up, the more disruptive the attack, which appears to be the purpose of all this. Ironically, this will probably make Bitcoin more resistant to this type of attack in the future. The haters are blowing their wad too soon. Anyways, thanks for the cheap sats and gfy.
0000 sats