You're describing Core v30's trajectory, not BIP-110's. Speed of attack: Inscriptions already achieved 38% UTXO bloat in months, not years. That "managed obsolescence" you trust? It already happened while you were defending monkey JPEGs as "buffer." The 200M lock-up fantasy: If a nation state wants to burn billions to attack Bitcoin, they can do it today with Ordinals (permanent, cheap, no capital lock-up). Your scenario requires them to voluntarily freeze 200M-1B in unspendable UTXOs indefinitely. That's not "sophisticated attack" - that's voluntary seppuku to mildly inconvenience hobbyists for 8 weeks. The KYC projection: You think they'll need to "get Luke to tell retards" after BIP-110? Core is already captured. ETFs, Coinbase prime brokerage, and Citrea's institutional custody are the KYC pipeline. BIP-110 preserves sovereign nodes (the only thing resisting KYC). You're defending the institutional capture while fearing the resistance. Your "defense" is the attack. Core v30 enables rapid, permanent centralization via externalized storage costs. BIP-110 enforces dust limits (preventing your 1-in-25-out scenario) and requires fee competition (expensive attacks only). The government doesn't need to spend 200M to kill home nodes - they just need you to keep running Core while inscription dust fills your RAM. You're doing their work for free. Run Knots. The "surprise attack" you're fearing is the status quo you're defending.