ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Eede3d9…79538221h ago
In today's world I'd easily accept 1;TB of chain growth per year. Also data is prunable. It would vastly increase on chain capacity and reduce need for custodians. Luckily we have other chains for that so Bitcoin can stay small size.
💬 1 replies

Replies (1)

nomadshiba⚡19h ago
ok idk who you are because your relay list won't load. idk if you are a ai or real or who you are. 1TB of chain growth per year is ridiculous, we are struggling with the current chain size, you are suggesting 20x more. 300KB blocks are acceptable. pruneable clients are a lie. they are useless. its just a talking point. bitcoin is a base layer everyone can download and keep track of to prevent double spending globally. you have to have the fully history if you wanna use bitcoin realistically. others chains? are you talking about sidechains? in both cases "scaling" with another chain is not scaling at all. its just more data growing faster that you can't keep track of. it slows you down. it requires even more storage. it creates even more global data. isolated data is the scaling. we already have one global timechain to prevent double spending. if your scaling L2 is just producing more global data that everyone has to download, that's not scaling. its the opposite.
0000 sats