ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
nicnym #BIP-11010d ago
Odell is it projection at this point? I’ve have been a fan of RHR and it’s sad to see you lash out like this, especially that podcast where you said bip-110 is an attack on Bitcoin. You said “my family depends on Bitcoin” -as if ALL OF US don’t depend on Bitcoin? And people like me don’t have a lot of VC IPO companies in the pipe that I can use for fiat gains just in case. You should honestly read and analyze bip-110 and its path to successful and NON-DISRUPTIVE activation.
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: cd96e5e5ea75…

Replying to: f545e0132e5a…

Replies (1)

ODELL10d ago
it is way too aggressive on restricting taproot, considering inscriptions will still be possible after, if the goal was actually achieving consensus then it probably should just be a cap on op return the flag day activation, without anywhere near consensus, is reckless and will cause a chain split, would be safer as a hard fork lot of talk of node counts and the power of node runners, but in practice this is exactly what a centralized mining attack would look like, whichever way the hash goes at activation all non updated nodes follow for instance, if blackrock and mstr and foundry want to freeze coin in the future, it would probably look like bip110 my default stance on any protocol changes is always no
0000 sats