ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
woodMiner34d ago
The problem is the "for free" part. Unless you have the hardware for it at home (and it has to be very good hardware) the locally run LLMs don't have enough capacity for the context windows that these agents need to be most effective so you have to hit one of the bigger providers APIs which gets expensive fast. If your agent is able to generate an income that is greater than his costs then you can use him "for free"
💬 1 replies

Thread context

Root: d8b262a155e9…

Replying to: 832c02f9812c…

Replies (1)

553e89b…84cfd034d ago
I see what you are saying although we are talking past each other on different points. no one is denying that it costs money in the form of hardware and energy to run an agent. But the sudden explosion of "my agent wants to be paid via sats" posts dramatically implies a cheesy AI self awareness/Bitcoin singularity. A more accurate representation is "I host compute or create agents and want to be paid via sats".
0000 sats