Nostr Archives

More people on my team, even though we are the minority, the war is lost. We just have to wait and see how little by little they destroy the essence of Bitcoin on both sides. Every open-source project needs a Linus Torvalds. We had one, it was Satoshi, but he is no longer with us. From my point of view, Bitcoin's development model without a central leader is a mistake.

💬 5 replies

Replies (5)

Sinautoshi31d ago

so you want decentralized money with leader? like vitalik?😅 🤣

0000 sats

Cyph3rp9nk31d ago

We had Satoshi, didn't we?

0000 sats

Cyph3rp9nk31d ago

Or does Linus Torvalds prevent you from making improvements to the kernel? What prevents you is making a mess like op_return, because Linus has good judgment. I think you have internalized democracy too much and don't understand the difference between decentralized money and development. If you don't protect the protocol, it will be destroyed.

0000 sats

Sinautoshi31d ago

NACK is the only protection which is basically a vote 😁 yes, we destroyed already the internet please dont hurt bitcoin.

0000 sats

eko31d ago

Linus prevents Russian programmers from making improvements to the kernel to be honest. So yes, there is a risk of centralization and hence binding to a physical jurisdinction, as was the case with Linux Foundation. However, same or even more risk exists with democratization.

0000 sats