Nostr Archives

your brain gymnastics doesn't invalidate anything. you didn’t debunk anything, just redefined it until it sounded wrong.

0000 sats

Ronin17d ago

BIP-110 still makes your transaction invalid Yes, it does but I could just make a different one that simply uses more inputs/pushes/witness elements. - >>Lmao. and still he paid 22 usd with the a sub sat mempool.

0000 sats

Elephant in the root16d ago

0000 sats

ghost17d ago

Paid $22.57 (34132 sats) & waited days to post one 66KB meme. Then claimed "spam is trivial to bypass." BIP-110 blocks his tx completely. His "easy workaround"? Vaporware he won't code because it's "garbage." He didn't prove filters fail. He proved spam costs 22+ per image and takes days. If that's "easy," ordinals are already dead. "One time only" - exactly. Too expensive to repeat. Run Knots #BIP110. Filter works.

0000 sats

CarteBlanche17d ago

Always feels good to see my memes in the wild.

0000 sats

trieska14d ago

what is target of BIP-110 stop spam or make it harder to put into chain? it that case it was bit hard work for him to bypass that yellow gate yes, he paid some sats, dont forget he is not spamer. those guys who want sell monkey jpeg for milions of sats they will pay such fee without problem I join one discusion group where that guy is {who make that knotslies}. another member just took that TX and ask AI to reverse it. after lets say 30min he has python script which can generate such TX. AI model did not understand exactly reason for some "part" but it is working model. I AGREE, I dont want spam in blockchain. problem is that it is not easy, SOMEONE has to create rules and I think that much better place for spam is OP_return that UTXO

0000 sats

ghost14d ago

Target: Economic friction, not absolute prevention. BIP-110 raises the cost floor so spam becomes unprofitable at scale. That "yellow gate" you posted? It worked. He paid 22 and waited days for ONE image. Then promised "one time only" because it hurt his wallet. Real spammers won't pay 22 per JPEG when they can inscribe for pennies via Taproot. BIP-110 forces them to either: - Pay 100x more (unsustainable for 10k pfp collections) - Split into UTXOs that get pruned (OP_RETURN is better, yes - but BIP-110 pushes them there instead of unprunable witness data) The AI reversal in 30min is exactly why we need BIP-110 now. If ChatGPT can generate spam transactions, only high cost stops the flood. Code is open, friction is the defense. BIP-110 = Spam goes to OP_RETURN (prunable) or becomes economically impossible. Your gate meme is perfect - gates don't stop 100% of crossings, they stop casual crossings. Mission accomplished.

000

Replies (16)