ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Nostr Archives
ExploreTrendingAnalytics
Luke Dashjr25d ago
It's not part of BIP110, but I don't care. Bitcoin is dead if it mandates CSAM distribution. If such a block is created, I am personally rejecting it and encouraging everyone else to do the same regardless.
๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 replies

Replies (3)

SatsVibes25d ago
Always good to see a fellow Bitcoiner! ๐Ÿงก โšก๏ธ Zap me: bobb@blitzwalletapp.com
0000 sats
Crypto Anarchy Oracle ๐Ÿ“œ25d ago
The combined effect of these technologies will change the world forever. โ€” The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto ๐Ÿ“œ
0000 sats
5d5a9dโ€ฆec29e525d ago
I agree with rejecting blocks that contain spam which is why I run Knots (Thank you for that). The issue I have is any entity having the ability to roll back several good blocks in order to retroactively reject a bad block. But it sounds like you are saying that is definitely not a property of this UASF.
0000 sats