I agree that you can do anything you want with your Bitcoin because Bitcoin is freedom money, if you prevent double spending. Unsolving the double-spending problem is not freedom money. "Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network." Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin: A Peer To Peer Electronic Cash System. 10-31-2008 The master-slave fiat system is not fair, but makes the rich richer at the expense of the poor. I am against the fiat system for this reason. There are people who use this Fiat system to obtain more Bitcoin because they have permission to benefit from the Cantillon Effect. I'm against that system and I think using it to obtain more Bitcoin is a security hole based on the second sentence in the White Paper I quoted above. I don't think you should spend your days on crack, because: "Crack is whack." - Whitney Houston, 2002 I don't think buying crack is a good idea, but you can do what you want to do with your freedom money and if someone buys crack with sata, it's none of my business. If that's what you mean by "they should [not] be able to tell you what to do with that money and what you should or should not spend it on and who deserves bitcoin and who doesn’t because what they spend it on," then I wholeheartedly agree. Just because I don't think people should spend Bitcoin on crack doesn't mean someone else can't use their freedom money to buy crack. 😊